Applied Materials No-Politics Thread (AMAT) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Applied Materials No-Politics Thread (AMAT)

AMAT 269.55

+0.3%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (3738)	10/24/2002 9:34:20 PM
From: Proud_Infidel	Read Replies (1) of 25522

Maybe that explains the diff between 2.25 and 2.4 ???? That may indeed be possible, but to make it a general rule is impossible isn't it? Some chips make large footprints while others are much smaller. I would not think it possible to quantify any gains in wafer space with the wide variety of IC's being produced, especially so early in the transition from 200mm to 300mm when the gains are less likely to be realized. Perhaps someone more knowledgeable than I could comment on this. Brian

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next