Gee whiz, you aren't going to take even the multiple choice! You really don't want to answer that question, do you?
Your question is designed to convey an image of you being harassed, receiving unwelcome attention over perhaps months, as Poet was, by CH. In fact, the subject was a simple, specific one and the email exchanges involved minutes, not months. You'd leveled a false PM blast and not allowed me to answer it. I answered it by email, a medium we were accustomed to using between us. Two more emails, both defiant (okay, childish: I said haha or something but in mitigation of not resisting the defiant impulse, I didn't know you were hearing voices) came from me, one after FIRST NOTICE, one after SECOND NOTICE.
I believe you know that there was no more to say between us about the subject that distressed us both (though in different ways, and you more than me) after the first email, actually. Our conversation on the topic at issue was more than over after the second email. The third was me sticking my tongue out at your threat to sue. (This assumes the apparent threat to sue was one, and not a different 3D threat cleverly disguised as that one to scare us.)
In fact! -- I don't have anything to say to you here, either, X! I don't PM you (though you PM'd me (with a helpful datum) not long ago, and I responded.) I don't email you. X, believe it or not, I don't find you interesting.
Again: You started this, and it was unnecessary. Again, I'm suggesting that you refrain from the "needling" you so enjoy, including inserting yourself provocatively into conversations I'm having with others-- refrain even when it requires you to resist springing to the defense of Christopher.
BTW: Neither N nor I has ever threatened to sue anyone. Or even tricked them into thinking we were threatening to sue them. |
