SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Gersh Avery who wrote (200459)10/27/2002 12:18:46 PM
From: Tommaso  Read Replies (1) of 436258
 
Well, it's not bureaucrats we are talking about. We are talking about janitors, school teachers, health workers, maintenance people, office workers, coaches, police, highway patrol, and so on, who make a big block of voters as well as enjoying the support of newspapers and much of the public at large.

Also, when these pension funds were first established and for many years thereafter they were terrifically underfunded. Only over a period of maybe 50 years have they crept up so that in some states they are (or were, before the market decline) greatly overfunded.

There are terrific differences between states, however, so I wouldn't venture to guess how it would play out. There may also be legal recourse on the part of organizations of state employees. If you take several hundred thousand people, you can raise quite a lot of money for legal fees if their pensions are threatened. There have certainly been, year after year, repeated promises of certain definite retirement benefits. Also, much of the money comes right out of the salaries of the employees.

It's hard for me to see how a maintenance worker in a state-owned building qualifies as a "bureaucrat"-- or a grade school teacher either.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext