Classic TA Workplace Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: John Madarasz who wrote (58251)	11/1/2002 9:32:34 AM
From: The Freep	Read Replies (2) of 209892

John -- nice post. I do have a question, however. << 4) There is the distinct possibilty that the 8.6 year cycle turn for Nov 8th (+/- 12 days) will be a HIGH time...not a low...inversion>> Perhaps you're more familiar with the PEI work than I am, but my understanding of it would really not allow for a "cycle inversion" in the same way as a Bradley. My read of it is that it's a fixed cycle that repeats in set intervals of time. My read is that the end of 8.6 years HAS to mark a low of the whole cycle. . . with the next cycle kicking off after that. (Personally, I'd call Oct 10 close enough to an 8.6 year cycle, even though I believe there's only a 12 day variance allowed according to the work). Is your reading of the PEI work different than mine? Can one of the dates somehow invert, not invalidating all the other time turns in the 8.6 year cycle? thanks, the freep

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next