Four can be generated from these comments, which find no place in your group of three. Possibly they represent merely a modification of or addendum to Number 3:
How much did you submit to the Studies being done by Various People, about the behind-the-scenes efforts by Laz, JLA, and me to get CH to come on over to SMBR and join the conversation, including PM proposals, one by me, to help him save face in the situation?
Did you submit to the Scholars, for inclusion in their Studies, Poet's medical records? CH's into-sadistic-porn posts about me? CH's sexual insinuations about Poet? His overturning the toorabout with a threat to sue?
Did you submit to the Various People conducting their Studies your post in which you write of your view that "the net is the place for bad behavior," and explain that "that is why [you] defended CH"? -- because, in your opinion, "you have [ie CH has] every right to be as much of an attack dog as [he wants] to be"? That btw was was the same post in which you wrote "I tend to hound people I want to hound just like you do." ...
You might mention also that you see your "attack dog" "rights" as extending to attacking a recently deceased friend of your fellow, mourning, posters. That would add a certain je ne sais quoi to their interest, I'd predict. |
