Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (55809)	11/5/2002 12:03:01 PM
From: zonder	Read Replies (1) of 281500

Nadine - Why are you confused? The Economist is pretty clear and is by no means a confusing source. "Roads" and "territorial reach" are not incomprehensible words/phrases, imho. "Sources unfriendly to the settlers"? Are you talking about The Economist, here? I did not realize The Economist was Palestine-friendly and settler-unfriendly. Can you explain? I did a Google and found quite a few mention of these aerial photos. I don't have the time to continue but you should be able to find them if you search. Here's a UN link that mentions the said photos: domino.un.org!OpenDocument . In addition, aerial photographs taken by a Palestinian non-governmental organization (NGO) and confirmed by a survey carried out by the Israeli Peace Now movement had shown that 34 new Israeli settlements had been built in the past year. -------26 March 2002

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next