Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 179.02

+3.7%

Nov 5 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: the_rich_janitor who wrote (125220)	11/8/2002 2:11:19 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) of 152472

TRJ, I'm not interested enough to tot up a scoreboard and that would be futile anyway. My point is just that Tero, like many other intelligent critics, has valid points of view and information which I like to take into account. GG [Geoff Goodfellow - who disappeared from SI during the floods in Prague] being another. Jay Chen, a wild and crazy doomster from Hong Kong being another. Many others too. Where is the wideband? Well, QUALCOMM seems to have some W-CDMA ASICs getting warm, so I believe it's moving beyond the VW-40 stage [VapourWear]. There's also Time Domain's super wideband becoming a possibility. It's ironic that the VW-40 which was designed to prolong GSM's reign and cut out QUALCOMM is being brought to life by QUALCOMM. I still don't understand why anyone wants W-CDMA instead of cdma2000 in the GSM1x form, but I suppose there's some reason. I've asked and asked but there seem to be no technical merits giving W-CDMA an advantage and no economic merits either. I quite honestly can't find any benefit over cdma2000. Thanks for your commentaries from time to time which I await with interest. Mqurice

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next