Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 164.53

-0.4%

Jan 14 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: qbull who wrote (28536)	11/8/2002 2:19:30 AM
From: the_rich_janitor	Read Replies (2) of 197214

Articles like this always make me feel so much better about my Q investment: <<<<<<``This is a declaration of war against Qualcomm,'' said Marko Maunula, an analyst at Conventum Securities.>>>> so dropping their royalty rate still leaves QCOM's royalty... which means that a WCDMA royalty is only 60% more than a cdma2000 royalty? <<<<<<<<<``own such a vast set of patents that they may be able to operate without using Qualcomm's patents at all,'' Maunula said.>>>>>>>>>> smart thinking. I assume the standard - Toys 'r' Us - law degree applies to this comment. Good thing this guy knows more about the patents then NOK, Siemens and ERICY. Didn't they already agree to pay QCOM 'THE' royalty? <<<<``High royalty payments have been seen as a factor slowing down industry development,'' said Petri Arjama, an analyst at Handelsbanken. ``This is positive for WCDMA technology>>>>>>>>>>> I knew it!!! Those darn royalty payments are responsible for WCDMA's 3 year delay. Someone please call TXN and tell them they can resume development now.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next