Hackers may get U.S. funds to fight China’s Web curbs
msnbc.com
By Murray Hiebert
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
Nov. 7 — If some lawmakers in the U.S. get their way, freedom-promoting computer hackers soon may receive a bucketful of money to battle China’s Internet-censoring police.
• Shop at B&N.com
• Auctions at uBid
• Yellow Pages
• lavalife.com Where singles click
• Professional Tips
• MSN Broadband
CHRISTOPHER COX, a House Republican from California, introduced legislation in early October that would create an Office of Global Internet Freedom and spend $100 million over two years to fund efforts to develop censorship-busting technology. China would be the main focus in Asia, but Vietnam, Burma, Laos and North Korea also would be targets.
Mr. Cox and his co-sponsors trumpet in their draft bill that “the Internet stands to become the most powerful engine for democratization and free exchange of ideas ever invented.”
Hacks, Viruses & Scams
• Fake INS Web sites trick immigrants
• One of key Net computers moved
• Lottery code may have been cracked
The congressman’s goals are lauded by human-rights activists, champions of a free Internet and opponents of China’s Communist leadership, but many computer experts and China specialists have reservations about whether throwing so much money at the problem will work. “I’m skeptical that any of the measures can be so effective that they can’t be counteracted” by Chinese authorities, says a senior official of the U.S. administration.
Analysts say the software being developed may help Chinese users circumvent official blocks. But they add that their activities may still be detectable by the authorities, leaving these users less protected than they believe and vulnerable to reprisals, including imprisonment.
Chinese officials have long been torn about whether to view the Internet as an engine to boost economic growth or as a subversive threat that could undermine the ruling Communist Party. According to a recent study by the Rand Corp. think tank, China has about 46 million Internet users, while at least 25 people have been arrested in the past two years for online activities. And after a deadly fire in an Internet cafe in Beijing earlier this year, the authorities closed thousands of Internet cafes and demanded that those allowed to reopen install surveillance and firewall software to block pornographic and “subversive” Web sites.
Advertisement
The Communist Party has always seen the media’s primary role as rallying public support for the party and its policies. So when the Internet came along, it was no surprise that the party wanted to control it, too, even as it recognized the Internet’s economic and educational benefits. The party’s biggest concern is that the Internet could be used by foreign or indigenous organizations, such as the banned Falun Gong spiritual movement, to organize opposition to Communist rule. It also worries that the Internet could be used to disseminate state secrets.
In an apparent bid to control users, China in late August blocked access to the Google Internet search engine for a brief period, diverting users to local Chinese search engines instead. In recent weeks, Beijing has shifted tactics again, opening some previously blocked Web sites but making it impossible for users to open documents on those sites that relate to China.
Playing now:
• Markets sink on Cisco forecast
• Wal-Mart leads October sales
• National Airlines stops flying
But even without U.S. government funding, hackers have begun developing programs to defeat Internet censorship in China. The new programs capitalize on the peer-to-peer architecture exploited earlier by Napster Inc. for sharing music files, but they have achieved mixed results.
Triangle Boy, a pilot project introduced in April 2001 by the California-based SafeWeb Inc., allows users to access the World Wide Web through an encrypted channel. SafeWeb, which received $250,000 from a U.S. Central Intelligence Agency venture-capital fund to develop the software, was paid almost $100,000 earlier this year by the Voice of America to help Chinese listeners access the radio station’s blocked Web site.
But one of the biggest problems facing Triangle Boy had been communicating Internet portal addresses to users without Chinese authorities’ finding them and blocking the sites. It suspended operations earlier this year.
A second program, Peekabooty, is being developed and funded by Canadian programmer Paul Baranowski. When Chinese using this software confront a blocked Internet site, they inform a network of computers running Peekabooty that then finds the requested information and returns it to the original computer in encrypted form.
A third program, Dynaweb, was launched in North Carolina in March by a group of Chinese-American engineers keen to open the Internet to users in China. Dynaweb, which helps Chinese users access blocked Internet sites and download banned documents, is difficult for Beijing to attack because it regularly changes its numerical Internet portal address, which the government uses to identify sites. Company spokesman Bill Dong says they would use any money provided by Mr. Cox’s legislation to “expand our server, make our performance better and respond to any technology China develops to stop us.”
“Definitely, some money will help” these groups, says Lee Tien of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a California-based organization that promotes the rights of Internet users world-wide. But Mr. Tien is concerned that the software developed so far hasn’t done enough to protect the identity of the users from China’s Internet police.
News from the WSJ
Wall Street Journal
stories on MSNBC
• Click here to bookmark
“China is now able to gather information about people who use the [new] software,” agrees James Mulvenon, co-author of a Rand study of the Internet in China. “Before throwing good money after bad, there needs to be a careful examination of the [software] designs,” the China specialist says about the possible funding.
Mr. Mulvenon questions whether Internet use will promote the profound political changes in China for which Mr. Cox and his colleagues hope. In the short term, he doubts that the Internet will lead to profound shifts in political power. “But in the long term, it is not difficult to imagine a situation in which the spread of information technology ... contributes to gradual pluralization of the system,” he says.
Copyright © 2002 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
All Rights Reserved. |
