SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : EDTA (was GIFT)
EDTA 0.000200+300.1%Mar 7 3:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: David A. who wrote (548)7/19/1996 12:44:00 PM
From: OHL   of 2383
 
Almost any argument could be presented in a court of law, once it is
decided that such argument has merit relative to the issue under litigation. This whole matter will be settled by the court(s) not us.

If the defendents desire to present Ed as a witness, then they have that right. This is where Freeny is so vitally important to Edata's cause. I'd almost bet if the shoes were on the other feet the "Big Boys" would have a strong argument about why Ed's deal will be no problem.

I have seen these type of tactics before and in this case it could
be mild next to what is coming down the road. The freeny patent must be allowed to speak for itself. Go back and see what it says.

Take a deep breath and think of just how big this case really is.
It is big, really, really big.

I do not believe that any of this information could change the bottom line. If someone knows otherwise, I would invite them to please email me at watson99@mail.idt.net. I love to hear all opinions as it gives me a better perspective.

Thanks to all of you, and please do not be hard on David Andry. He
is gracious enough to share his research, and I certainly appreciate that. Thanks David!

Sincerely my opinions,

Debra Watson

Watson99@mail.idt.net
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext