SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Strictly: Drilling II

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: re3 who wrote (21661)11/11/2002 10:55:13 AM
From: SliderOnTheBlack  Read Replies (2) of 36161
 
retired...

I thought it was perhaps (tongue in cheek)... especially the part about JPM (vbg).

PS: Art B

...I don't think we'll be "in & out" in Iraq - quite the contrary actually.

We'll remain in the area as a stabilizing force/presence for the new regime in Iraq, for the Middle East, for Oil Prices (we can't afford the hit that $40-$60 Oil Prices would bring here)and will use Iraq (and it's Oil) as a longterm staging area for the ongoing (longterm) War on Terrorism.

And as far as snipers, bio booby-traps etc... let's hope that will be minimal and I truly expect the type of reaction that was seen with Mussolini... but, regardless of the cost, or threat - GW is literally (in his and the minds of many) on a mission from God, to wipe the threat of Global Terrorism, especially those rogue nations, or terrorists with nuclear, or bio-weapons and the will to, or the history of already having used them.

I don't think Bush, or any who support his policies; view Iraq, or the War on Terrorism as a short term, low risk, or low cost proposition...but, do view it as something that must be done, regardless of the costs political, or otherwise.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext