Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 174.69

0.0%

Dec 24 12:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: engineer who wrote (28746)	11/11/2002 12:28:34 PM
From: John Biddle	Read Replies (1) of 197031

no, the GSM1x standard proposed calls out a fallback mode to GSM when no CDMA1x service is available, so EVERY GSM1x phone is a GSM phone. Sorry to be thick, but I want to make sure I have this right. I think I do and that we just mis-communicated, but I want to be sure. I appreciate your forebearance. Are you saying that a GSM1x phone is just a dual mode, GSM / 1x phone, with 1x the primary choice if it or both are available and GSM the fallback if only it is available? If so, that is really nothing special, and fits what I meant, if not what I said, when I said there was nothing special technically about GSM1x to the consumer. A GSM1x phone would work the same in a GSM1x populated geography as would a dual mode GSM/1x phone where there were carriers using each technology but not both, so long as they had roaming agreements. The dual mode GSM1x phone would, in the latter case, have the primary set to whichever technology was used by the user's carrier. Right?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next