Jabil Circuit (JBL) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Jabil Circuit (JBL)

JBL 218.17

+4.3%

Nov 5 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Sam who wrote (6148)	11/12/2002 2:56:01 PM
From: OldAIMGuy	Read Replies (1) of 6317

<Very OT> Hi Sam, Please don't forget that even combatants in the ring shake hands once in a while. It's even been shown in history that an entire people will decide on a specific course of action. At these times in history, would it have been right for the Executive or Legislative branches to nullify a course of action because it was their "constitutional duty" to always be contrary? Cannot two people or two branches of the government "independently" come to the same conclusion? Right or wrong, the independence of the decision-making process can still be preserved even if the conclusion remains identical. I once read that it should require a 2/3 majority to pass any legislation and a 1/3 minority to remove any such laws. Seems to me there'd be a lot less disgruntled people around. (and most likely fewer and better laws) Best regards, Tom

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next