SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (9180)11/13/2002 1:07:48 PM
From: pogbull  Read Replies (1) of 89467
 
Truck Driver Loans in Default

Credit Markets: Truck-School Loans Get Lost as Royal Indemnity Files Suit

biz.yahoo.com

Monday November 11, 9:38 pm ET
By Christine Richard and David Feldheim

Dow Jones Newswires

NEW YORK -- Wall Street sells asset-backed bonds that are supported by payments on everything from credit-card balances to boat loans and doctor bills for plastic surgery.
But it may have met its match in truck-driving-school student loans.

Some transactions valued at more than half a billion dollars -- backed by more than 90,000 truck-school student loans that were bundled, insured and sold to investors -- have steered off course, setting in motion a pileup of recriminations and sending a convoy of lawyers down to Texas.

The loans were securitized by Student Finance Corp. in Radnor, Pa. About 70% of the loans are in default as a result of the subprime nature of the borrowers and a weakening economy.

Loan insurer Royal Indemnity Corp., which wrote policies insuring students' interest and principal payments, is suing SFC, its former officers and a number of truck-driving schools, charging fraud. Royal is the U.S. subsidiary of Royal & Sun Alliance, which announced a radical restructuring plan Thursday aimed at shoring up its capital position and improving profits.

"Royal did not intend to insure abnormal credit risks of this type and magnitude," Royal Indemnity said in a complaint filed in June in state district court in Jefferson County, Texas.

Among other things, Royal Indemnity alleges that SFC used the proceeds of new loans to cover up defaults on loans outstanding. Royal Indemnity also points at some of the trucking schools, alleging that the loans were so lucrative for the schools that they were granted "without regard to the likelihood of repayment."

Bruce Haines, an attorney with Hangley Aronchick Segal & Pudlin in Philadelphia, which is representing the former officers of SFC, said his clients "deny all allegations of fraud or misconduct" claimed by Royal Indemnity.

Sharon Asch, senior analyst at Moody's Investors Service Inc., said vocational-school student loans not backed by a government guarantee carry high risk. "We've seen default rates as high as the 50% to 60% range," Ms. Asch said.

Because truckers spend so much time on the road, they are tough to track down when payment problems arise. It hasn't helped matters that employment in the trucking industry has been going downhill along with the economy.

Complicating the matter, SFC filed for bankruptcy-court protection Nov. 4.

Despite the fracas and SFC filing, the SFC bonds remain rated triple-A, the highest possible credit rating. The bonds were issued through a bankruptcy- remote trust, meaning they won't be affected by SFC's bankruptcy-court filing. Like most asset-backed securities with top ratings, the bonds carry a guarantee of payment for the holders.

New York-based bond insurer MBIA Inc. (NYSE:MBI - News) stands by its guarantee on principal and interest payments to holders of the SFC bonds, MBIA spokesman Mike Ballinger said. MBIA has filed a lawsuit with Wells Fargo Corp.'s Wells Fargo Bank, trustee on some of the transactions, against Royal Indemnity to force it to make good on its policies covering the loans, Mr. Ballinger said.

Bondholders are in a much better position than holders of securities issued by National Century Financial Enterprise, a Dublin, Ohio, health-care-receivables financing company. That company has been making headlines since Moody's downgraded its asset-backed bonds 12 notches and Fitch Ratings withdrew its ratings on the bonds altogether, both citing the company's alleged misappropriation of reserve funds used to back the bonds.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext