SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Moominoid who wrote (6795)11/14/2002 11:00:44 AM
From: TradeliteRead Replies (2) of 306849
 
David, if real estate people found the market responsive to hourly fees or fee-for-service arrangements, they would probably like to go to this model.

However, real estate agents would then expect to be treated like other people who charge this way--meaning you pay the lawyer even if he loses your case, you pay the doctor even if you die, and you pay the agent who spent months showing you houses even though you decided not to buy one, or you took your house off the market and decided not to sell.

They would probably also then be able to work the same hours as other professionals--no night work (except at overtime pay, maybe), no weekends---no more of this 24/7 stuff that they find themselves doing when working on transactions. Clients would generally then have to get better organized themselves and stop messing around, dragging their feet or doing certain other things that would run up the hourly bill.

Is it realistic to expect this to happen in the residential real estate field? Doubt it. It works in commercial real estate just fine, but that's business-to-business-type selling using an institution's money instead of personal funds, not people-to-people selling when they're buying or selling their biggest investment.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext