Dismissive of any else of substance ...
Epithets, even !
It's really not worth digressing as it has little to do with the substance of my post, but as far as 1200 SAT and B- average, here's a guy who can't put together a coherent sentence, perhaps you can lay that as brain damage from excessive cocaine and alcohol, or odd mental quirk. He was AWOL from military duty for a year, but somehow got a pass. That's an uncomfortable fact that speaks poorly for the likelihood he actually got the above marks.
Did you see "Travels with George" last night?
Excellent. You can see Junior in action, life of the party type guy, hail fellow well met, except in the policy department a total nullity. It's also clear he can't answer questions, such as "are you sure all the people you executed were guilty?".... "Next question". Anyone with the courage of their convictions would answer that question. He didn't have a script prepared, so he couldn't. (And yet he allowed these people to be killed, in fact mocked one on public radio shortly before she was executed. That speaks to attitude and intellectual integrity, and the attitude of the rest of the group - , i.e., even if you don't know what you're doing, it's ok to kill, if you have the authority.)
Anyway, read my previous post, and if you can actually respond intelligently rather than sputtering epithets and running away to hide, I'll certainly give you credit. |
