SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: GraceZ who wrote (6880)11/17/2002 9:26:19 AM
From: Wyätt GwyönRead Replies (1) of 306849
 
If this is true:...
How can this be true:...


this is a valid point. however, there may be some counterintuitive explanation. e.g., there may be other interest earners, such as pension funds, that are attributed to household interest income. or perhaps it is the older segment (65 and older) that earns all the interest. or that the debt held by the -173K cohort (mainly mortgages) is lower-yielding on average than the assets held by the interest earners. or that a large segment of the debtors are not servicing their liabilities. or some combination thereof. i certainly don't have the answer.

i think you should ask Roach for an explanation of this. but i would not automatically assume that the -173K net worth figure is wrong, or that one of these apparently contradictory statements is untrue.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext