VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: P. Ramamoorthy who wrote (25685)	11/17/2002 8:00:35 PM
From: Tickertype	Read Replies (1) of 27311

You make some good points, Ram. I'm always disappointed in the questions we get on the cc's, or I should say the lack of good questions. For example, I'd like to know if they did achieve the 5 mm whr/month goal they had for last summer. Nobody asked and Stephan didn't say. I also wonder how things are going with the two other Asian licensees who were gearing up to produce smaller format stacked batteries, not including Fengfan I mean. And I'd sure like to have the Hanil situation cleared up once and for all, meaning are they still intending to produce batteries or have they closed their doors as some posted rumors claim? As for the stock remaining listed, I heard recently on the news that Nasdaq was considering lowering the stock price requirement to something below $1, apparently because so many stocks have now been delisted that the Naz is in danger of becoming extinct (I'm exaggerating a little of course, but I believe about 40% of the Nasdaq listed stocks have now dropped off the index). But if Valence gets just one decent PO from a tier 1 customer, this isn't likely to be a concern anymore. - T -

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next