SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: frankw1900 who wrote (57688)11/18/2002 8:46:58 AM
From: zonder  Read Replies (2) of 281500
 
Re We disagree clearly on what are sufficient grounds for attacking a country.

Obviously.

Attacking another soverign country just because their way of life is not ideal according to your country's prevailing way of life goes well beyond the justified use of force specified in Article 51 of the U.S. Charter, which says a country facing armed attack, such as Kuwait in 1990, is entitled to fight in self-defense, and that other countries may assist due to the "collective self-defense" clause. But barring this scenario, legal use of military force is vested only in the U.N. Security Council, which may take action to maintain or restore international peace and security. Otherwise, the use of military force is prohibited under international law.

sundayherald.com

The US must not be allowed to push ahead regardless towards a war which is possibly illegal -- there are no grounds for attacking Iraq -- and most definitely unpopular.

It was one thing to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with our closest ally when the heavens seemed to be falling in the aftermath of September 11, but it is quite another to join an unprovoked attack against another country, however despicable its government might be and whatever the risk it poses to regional stability.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext