SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
QCOM 159.42-1.2%Jan 16 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: foundation who wrote (29089)11/19/2002 8:14:08 AM
From: foundation  Read Replies (2) of 197253
 
UMTS Release 99 Corrections continued:
33nd TSG-RAN WG2 meeting, France, 12-15 November 2002)

R2-022822 Proposed CR to 25.331 [R'99] on Frame Allocation Calculation Interdigital
R2-022823 Proposed CR to 25.331 [Rel-4 shadow] on Frame Allocation Calculation Interdigital
R2-022824 Proposed CR to 25.331 [Rel-5 shadow] on Frame Allocation Calculation Interdigital
This document was presented by Daniel Tsui from Interdigital.
Discussion:
The coversheet needs to be updated (among others to add a system impact on what is not working if the frame calculation is incorrect).
Decision: The CRs were agreed into R2-023069, R2-023070, R2-023071; CR numbers in 1717, 1718, 1719.

R2-022833 Proposed CR to 25.331 [R'99] on Inter-frequency measurements Ericsson
R2-022834 Proposed CR to 25.331 [Rel-4 shadow] on Inter-frequency measurements Ericsson
R2-022835 Proposed CR to 25.331 [Rel-5 shadow] on Inter-frequency measurements Ericsson
This document was presented by Gert-Jan from Ericsson.
Discussion:
On the issue 2, comment that the measurement control may be received after that the compressed mode is activated.
Answer: The intention was not to discriminate this, so this case is not excluded.
Comment: The additional text for active cells discriminates between intra and inter frequency. This duplicates the sections. Also the UE will perform it for both cases.
Answer: This is a re-use of the already existing semantics, where the discrimination already exists.
Comment: The proposed change prevents from reporting cells on the same frequency in the case of the inter-frequency measurement.
Answer: Again, this is a re-use of the already existing functionality.
Comment: The first proposed change allows extra and new configurations from the network. Also the maximum number of reported cells per frequency is not the more obvious understanding, the total number of cells seems more natural.
Question: What is the "frequency actually used"
Answer: The active set frequency.
What are the consequences of a UE not behaving like in this CR ?
Decision: The CRs were revised into tdocs R2-023072, R2-023073 and R2-023074. CR numbers in 1720, 1721 and 1722.

R2-023072 Proposed CR 1720 to 25.331 [R'99] on Inter-frequency measurements Ericsson
R2-023073 Proposed CR 1721 to 25.331 [Rel-4] on Inter-frequency measurements Ericsson
R2-023074 Proposed CR 1722 to 25.331 [Rel-5] on Inter-frequency measurements Ericsson
This document was presented by Gert-Jan from Ericsson.
Discussion:
Decision: The CRs were agreed (as they are).

R2-022842 Proposed CR to 25.331 [R'99] on Maximum Allowed UL TX Power Nokia
R2-022843 Proposed CR to 25.331 [Rel-4 shadow] on Maximum Allowed UL TX Power Nokia
R2-022844 Proposed CR to 25.331 [Rel-5 shadow] on Maximum Allowed UL TX Power Nokia
This document was presented by Thomas Ballon from Nokia.
Discussion:
Decision:The CRs were agreed in R2-023075, R2-023076, R2-023077. CR numbers in 1723, 1724 and 1725.

R2-022876 Proposed CR to 25.331 [R'99] on START values for the initialisation of SRB counters and UTRAN incorrect actions Nortel Networks and Motorola
R2-022877 Proposed CR to 25.331 [Rel-4 shadow] on START values for the initialisation of SRB counters and UTRAN incorrect actions Nortel Networks and Motorola
R2-022878 Proposed CR to 25.331 [Rel-5 shadow] on START values for the initialisation of SRB counters and UTRAN incorrect actions Nortel Networks and Motorola
This document was presented by Tania Godard from Nortel Networks.
Discussion:
An update is needed for the Cell update part. A new section needs to be added.
Is the current subclause 8.3.1.5 really incorrect ?
Decision: The CRs were agreed into tdocs R2-023078, R2-023079, R2-023080. CR numbers in 1726, 1727 and 1728.

R2-022781 Transaction table management inconsistencies Philips
This document was presented by Sylviane Roullier from Philips.
Discussion:
Which exact problem are we trying to solve ?
Decision:
Only the change in 8.6.3.11 will be kept. Also the "else" is at the wrong place. Also the "consequences if not approved" is incomplete.
The associated CRs are agreed into R2-023081, R2-023082 and R2-023083. CR numbers in 1729, 1730 and 1731.

R2-022889 Proposed CR to 25.331 [R'99] on Correction to compressed mode UE variable NTT DoCoMo
R2-022890 Proposed CR to 25.331 [Rel-4 shadow] on Correction to compressed mode UE variable NTT DoCoMo
R2-022891 Proposed CR to 25.331 [Rel-5 shadow] on Correction to compressed mode UE variable NTT DoCoMo
This document was withdrawn before presentation.
Discussion:
Decision:

R2-022895 Proposed CR to 25.331 [R'99] on Critical extensions Nokia
R2-022896 Proposed CR to 25.331 [Rel-4 shadow] on Critical extensions Nokia
R2-022897 Proposed CR to 25.331 [Rel-5 shadow] on Critical extensions Nokia
This document was presented by Gairn Kalla from Nokia.
Discussion:
Question: What is the size of the field ?
Answer: The length field is embedded at the beginning of the bit string. This is 8 bits by default.
What is the maximum size of the field ?
Comment: This CR should specify the content of the field if this is sent.
Answer: Then we could specify that is should not be sent in this version of the protocol, instead.
Question: What about the SIBs ?
Answer: If we need it (which is unlikely), a new SIB could be added.
We should have some notes in the Rel-4 onwards so that non critical extensions of the R'99 are not impacted. More generally, the impact of the Rel-4 on the R'99 needs to be checked.
A UE receiving the information should ignore it.
Decision:
The Rel-4 extension mechanism will be removed. Notes in the Rel-4 and Rel-5 will be added. The UE will not send the information in this version of the protocol. The CRs were revised in R2-023084, R2-023085 and R2-023086. CR numbers in 1732, 1733 and 1734.

R2-023084 Proposed CR 1732 to 25.331 [R'99] on the Introduction of backwards compatible correction mechanism Nokia
R2-023085 Proposed CR 1733 to 25.331 [Rel-4] on the Introduction of backwards compatible correction mechanism Nokia
R2-023086 Proposed CR 1734 to 25.331 [Rel-5] on the Introduction of backwards compatible correction mechanism Nokia
This document was presented by Luis Barreto from Nokia.
Discussion:
This extension container would add an overhead on the Handover Request message on the GSM radio interface.
Decision: The CRs were agreed.

R2-023090 Proposed CR 1788 to 25.331[R'99] on compact IMEI-SV transfer across Uu and within RRC containers Ericsson
R2-023091 Proposed CR 1789 to 25.331[Rel-4 shadow] on compact IMEI-SV transfer across Uu and within RRC containers Ericsson
R2-023092 Proposed CR 1790 to 25.331[Rel-5 shadow] on compact IMEI-SV transfer across Uu and within RRC containers Ericsson
This document was presented by Himke van der Velde from Ericsson.
Discussion:
Decision: The CRs were technically endorsed (with further changes) into R2-023236, R2-023237 and R2-023238.

R2-023093 Proposed CR 1735 to 25.331 [R'99] on compact IMEI-SV transfer across Uu Ericsson
R2-023094 Proposed CR 1736 to 25.331 [Rel-4 shadow] on compact IMEI-SV transfer across Uu Ericsson
R2-023095 Proposed CR 1737 to 25.331 [Rel-5 shadow] on compact IMEI-SV transfer across Uu Ericsson
This document was presented by Himke van der Velde from Ericsson.
Discussion:
This version of the Change Requests would impact the GSM radio interface and the Core Network.
Decision: This set of CRs was not technically endorsed (and not agreed).

R2-023123 Proposed CR 1758 to 25.331 [R'99] on UE Conformance State Information in RRC Connection request and Inter RAT info Alcatel, Fujitsu, Motorola, NEC, Orange, Siemens
R2-023124 Proposed CR 1759 to 25.331 [Rel-4 shadow] on UE Conformance State Information in RRC Connection request and Inter RAT info Alcatel, Fujitsu, Motorola, NEC, Orange, Siemens
R2-023125 Proposed CR 1760 to 25.331 [Rel-5 shadow] on UE Conformance State Information in RRC Connection request and Inter RAT info Alcatel, Fujitsu, Motorola, NEC, Orange, Siemens
This document was revised before presentation into R2-023216, R2-023217 and R2-023218:

R2-023216 Proposed CR 1758 Rev1 to 25.331 [R'99] on UE Conformance State Information in RRC Connection request and Inter RAT info Alcatel, Fujitsu, Motorola, NEC, Orange, Siemens
R2-023217 Proposed CR 1759 Rev1 to 25.331 [Rel-4 shadow] on UE Conformance State Information in RRC Connection request and Inter RAT info Alcatel, Fujitsu, Motorola, NEC, Orange, Siemens
R2-023218 Proposed CR 1760 Rev1 to 25.331 [Rel-5 shadow] on UE Conformance State Information in RRC Connection request and Inter RAT info Alcatel, Fujitsu, Motorola, NEC, Orange, Siemens
This document was presented by Patrick Fischer from Alcatel.
Discussion:
Decision: 4 bits will be used in the RRC Connection request, and 8 bits for the inter RAT. The name of the field will be changed. Also, "In this version of the protocol" will be used instead.
The CRs were technically endorsed in R2-023239, R2-023240 and R2-023241.

R2-023126 Proposed CR 1761 to 25.331 [R'99] on UE Conformance State Information in Handover complete and Setup complete messages Alcatel, Fujitsu, Motorola, NEC, Orange, Siemens
R2-023127 Proposed CR 1762 to 25.331 [Rel-4] on UE Conformance State Information in Handover complete and Setup complete messages Alcatel, Fujitsu, Motorola, NEC, Orange, Siemens
R2-023128 Proposed CR 1763 to 25.331 [Rel-5] on UE Conformance State Information in Handover complete and Setup complete messages Alcatel, Fujitsu, Motorola, NEC, Orange, Siemens
This document was presented by Patrick Fischer from Alcatel.
Discussion:
The Rel-4 CR should be category A.
The name of the field will be changed.
Decision: The CRs were technically endorsed in R2-023242, R2-023243 and R2-023244.

R2-022935 Proposed CR to 25.331 [R'99] on the Use of DCH Quality Target with Blind Transport Format Detection Motorola
R2-022936 Proposed CR to 25.331 [Rel-4 shadow] on the Use of DCH Quality Target with Blind Transport Format Detection Motorola
R2-022937 Proposed CR to 25.331 [Rel-5 shadow] on the Use of DCH Quality Target with Blind Transport Format Detection Motorola
This document was presented by Richard Burbidge from Motorola.
Discussion:
Decision: The CRs will be revised an represented, in tdocs R2-023097, R2-023098 and 023099. CR numbers in 1738, 1739 and 1803. The Change Requests will be seen again:

R2-023097 Proposed CR 1738 to 25.331 [R'99] on the Use of DCH Quality Target with Blind Transport Format Detection Motorola
R2-023098 Proposed CR 1739 to 25.331 [Rel-4 shadow] on the Use of DCH Quality Target with Blind Transport Format Detection Motorola
R2-023099 Proposed CR 1803 to 25.331 [Rel-5 shadow] on the Use of DCH Quality Target with Blind Transport Format Detection Motorola
This document was presented by Richard Burbidge from Motorola.
Discussion:
Decision: The CRs were agreed (as they are).

R2-022942 Proposed CR to 25.331 [R'99] on Correction to storing current TFC subset in variable TFC_SUBSET for TDD IPWireless
R2-022943 Proposed CR to 25.331 [Rel-4 shadow] on Correction to storing current TFC subset in variable TFC_SUBSET for TDD IPWireless
R2-022944 Proposed CR to 25.331 [Rel-5 shadow] on Correction to storing current TFC subset in variable TFC_SUBSET for TDD IPWireless
This document was presented by Tim Speight from IPWireless.
Discussion:
Decision: The CRs will be revised in R2-023100, R2-023101 and R2-023102. CR numbers in 1740, 1741 and 1742. We will see them again.

R2-023100 Proposed CR 1740 to 25.331 [R'99] on Correction to storing current TFC subset in variable TFC_SUBSET for TDD IPWireless
R2-023101 Proposed CR 1741 to 25.331 [Rel-4 shadow] on Correction to storing current TFC subset in variable TFC_SUBSET for TDD IPWireless
R2-023102 Proposed CR 1742 to 25.331 [Rel-5 shadow] on Correction to storing current TFC subset in variable TFC_SUBSET for TDD IPWireless
This document was presented by Tim Speight from IPWireless.
Discussion:
Decision: The CRs were agreed (as they are).

R2-022945 Proposed CR to 25.331 [R'99] on Security inter RAT HO Ericsson
R2-022946 Proposed CR to 25.331 [Rel-4 shadow] on Security inter RAT HO Ericsson
R2-022947 Proposed CR to 25.331 [Rel-5 shadow] on Security inter RAT HO Ericsson
This document was presented by Anders Berggren from Ericsson.
Discussion:
Decision: The CRs were agreed into R2-023103, R2-023104 and R2-023105. CR numbers in 1743, 1744 and 1745.

R2-022948 Proposed CR to 25.331 [R'99] on Integrity protection activation time Ericsson
R2-022949 Proposed CR to 25.331 [Rel-4 shadow] on Integrity protection activation time Ericsson
R2-022950 Proposed CR to 25.331 [Rel-5 shadow] on Integrity protection activation time Ericsson
This document was presented by Anders from Ericsson.
Discussion:
Decision: Those CRs were agreed in R2-023106, R2-023107 and R2-023108. CR numbers in 1746, 1747 and 1748.

R2-022951 Discussion document on Additional measurements Ericsson
This document was presented by Gert-Jan from Ericsson.
This is a proposed CR on 25.331.
Discussion:
Comment on the impact of changes on the coversheet (for the first bullet point).
Decision: The CRs were agreed into R2-023109, R2-023110 and R2-023111. CR numbers in 1749, 1750 and 1751.

R2-022952 Discussion document on DPCH compressed mode info in Downlink information common for all RLs Ericsson
This document was presented by Gert-Jan Lieshout from Ericsson.
Discussion:
What are the sytem consequences if the change is not agreed ? This will be added.
Decision: The CRs were agreed into R2-023112, R2-023113 and R2-023114. CR numbers in 1752, 1753 and 1754.

R2-022956 Discussion on RLC window size in default configurations Ericsson
This document was presented by Himke van der Velde from Ericsson.
Discussion:
Decision: The CRs were agreed into R2-023129, R2-023130 and R2-023131. CR numbers in 1764, 1765 and 1766.

R2-022959 Proposed CR to 25.331 on Activation time and minor editorial clarifications Ericsson
R2-022960 Proposed CR to 25.331 [Rel-4 shadow] on Activation time and minor editorial clarifications Ericsson
R2-022961 Proposed CR to 25.331 [Rel-5 shadow] on Activation time and minor editorial clarifications Ericsson
This document was presented by Joakim Bergstrom from Ericsson.
Discussion:
Decision: The title will be changed to correction on activation time. (The changes from the Philips document in R2-022987 on the formula for transport block size calculation will be included in the CR which is in tdoc R2-023119). The CRs were agreed into R2-023132, R2-023133 and R2-023134. CR numbers in 1767, 1768 and 1769.

R2-022965 Withdrawn CR to 25.331 [R'99] on Clarification of TFCS selection guidelines for RACH Qualcomm
R2-022966 Withdrawn CR to 25.331 [Rel-4 shadow] on Clarification of TFCS selection guidelines for RACH Qualcomm
R2-022967 Withdrawn CR to 25.331 [Rel-5 shadow] on Clarification of TFCS selection guidelines for RACH Qualcomm
This document was withdrawn before presentation.

R2-022971 Proposed CR to 25.331 [R'99] on Numbering of "ASC Setting" IEs included in "PRACH partitioning" IE Qualcomm
R2-022972 Proposed CR to 25.331 [Rel-4 shadow] on Numbering of "ASC Setting" IEs included in "PRACH partitioning" IE Qualcomm
R2-022973 Proposed CR to 25.331 [Rel-5 shadow] on Numbering of "ASC Setting" IEs included in "PRACH partitioning" IE Qualcomm
This document was presented by Francesco Grilli from Qualcomm.
Discussion:
One sentence could be read in two different way.s
Decision: The CRs were agreed into R2-023135, R2-023136 and R2-023137. CRs 1770, 1771 and 1772.

R2-022974 Proposed CR to 25.331 [R'99] on Closed loop Tx diversity with different timing adjustment modes in the same active set Qualcomm
R2-022975 Proposed CR to 25.331 [Rel-4 shadow] on Closed loop Tx diversity with different timing adjustment modes in the same active set Qualcomm
R2-022976 Proposed CR to 25.331 [Rel-5 shadow] on Closed loop Tx diversity with different timing adjustment modes in the same active set Qualcomm
This document was presented by Francesco Grilli from Qualcomm.
Discussion:
Decision:
There are two possible Rel-4 solutions.
Hence, we need one CR on the R'99 plus shadow Rel-4.
Plus a CR on the Rel-4 and Rel-5. One Rel-4 shadow will be withdrawn.
The CRs were revised into R2-023138, R2-023139 and R2-023140 and R2-023141. CRs 1773, 1774, 1775 and 1776. We will see them again.

R2-023138 Proposed CR 1773 to 25.331 [R'99] on Signalling of the timing adjustment mode for closed loop Tx diversity Qualcomm
R2-023139 Proposed CR 1774 to 25.331 [Rel-4 shadow] on Signalling of the timing adjustment mode for closed loop Tx diversity Qualcomm
R2-023140 Proposed CR 1775 to 25.331 [Rel-4 shadow] on Closed loop Tx diversity with different timing adjustment modes in the same active set Qualcomm
R2-023141 Proposed CR 1776 to 25.331 [Rel-5 shadow] on Closed loop Tx diversity with different timing adjustment modes in the same active set Qualcomm
This document was presented by Francesco Grilli from Qualcomm.
Discussion:
Decision: CRs 1773 and 1776 (the R'99 and Rel-5) were agreed. CRs 1774 and 1775 (the Rel-4) were technically endorsed.

R2-023021 Interpretation of UE radio access parameter "Need for compressed mode" when set to FALSE Mitsubishi Electric Telecom Europe
This document was presented by Vincent Belaiche from Mitsubishi.
Discussion:
Decision: CRs will be provided in R2-023142, R2-023143 and R2-023144. CR numbers in 1777, 1778 and 1779. We will see them again.

R2-023142 Proposed CR 1777 to 25.331 [R'99] on correction on support for compressed mode Mitsubishi Electric Telecom Europe
R2-023143 Proposed CR 1778 to 25.331 [Rel-4] on correction on support for compressed mode Mitsubishi Electric Telecom Europe
R2-023144 Proposed CR 1779 to 25.331 [Rel-5] on correction on support for compressed mode Mitsubishi Electric Telecom Europe
Those documents were revised before presentation into R2-023185, R2-023186 and R2-023187.

R2-023185 Proposed CR 1777Rev1 to 25.331 [R'99] on correction on support for compressed mode Mitsubishi Electric Telecom Europe
R2-023186 Proposed CR 1778Rev1 to 25.331 [Rel-4] on correction on support for compressed mode Mitsubishi Electric Telecom Europe
R2-023187 Proposed CR 1779Rev1 to 25.331 [Rel-5] on correction on support for compressed mode Mitsubishi Electric Telecom Europe
This document was treated with the general discussion document on the subject, from Mitsubishi, where it was revised into R2-023250, R2-023251 and R2-023251:

R2-023250 Proposed CR 1777Rev2 to 25.331 [R'99] on correction on support for compressed mode Mitsubishi Electric Telecom Europe
R2-023251 Proposed CR 1778Rev2 to 25.331 [Rel-4 shadow] on correction on support for compressed mode Mitsubishi Electric Telecom Europe
R2-023252 Proposed CR 1779Rev2 to 25.331 [Rel-5 shadow] on correction on support for compressed mode Mitsubishi Electric Telecom Europe
This document was presented by Vincent Belaiche from Mitsubishi. Those CRs are linked with the outgoing LS in R2-023249.
Discussion:
Decision: See the discussions in R2-023249 (CR 1777 Rev2 was revised and agreed and CRs 1778 Rev2 and 1779 Rev2 were agreed as they were).

6.14 Proposed changes on 25.921
R2-022898 Proposed CR to 25.921 [R'99] on the Introduction of backwards compatible correction mechanism Nokia
R2-022899 Proposed CR to 25.921 [Rel-4 shadow] on the Introduction of backwards compatible correction mechanism Nokia
R2-022900 Proposed CR to 25.921 [Rel-5 shadow] on the Introduction of backwards compatible correction mechanism Nokia
The Change Requests were revised before presentation into tdocs R2-023087, R2-023088 and R2-023089. CR numbers in 042, 043 and 044.

R2-023087 Proposed CR 042 to 25.921 [R'99] on the Introduction of backwards compatible correction mechanism Nokia
R2-023088 Proposed CR 043 to 25.921 [Rel-4] on the Introduction of backwards compatible correction mechanism Nokia
R2-023089 Proposed CR 044 to 25.921 [Rel-5] on the Introduction of backwards compatible correction mechanism Nokia
This document was presented by Gairn Kalla from Nokia.
Discussion:
Decision: The CRs were agreed.

6.15 Proposed changes on 25.922
There was no input for this agenda item.
6.16 Proposed changes on 25.925
There was no input for this agenda item.
6.17 Proposed changes on 25.993 on RAB/RB examples

R2-022849 TR 25.993 on RAB/RB examples Nortel Networks
This document was revised before presentation into R2-023122.

R2-023122 Latest draft version of 25.993 Nortel Networks and Siemens
This document was presented by Denis Fauconnier on behalf of Nortel Networks.
Discussion:
Comments on the numbering, to align with TS 34.108.
Decision: The update with numbering modified will be provided (by Axel Klatt from T-Mobile, in R2-023215). There are also some proposals for new RAB/RBs. Discussions on capabilities should also happen.

R2-023115 New RABs for TR 25.993 Hutchison 3G
This document was presented by Gordon Young from Hutchison 3G.
Discussion:
Are the Transport Format Combination Set correct ?
Decision:Those new RABs will be inculded in the TR 25.993.

R2-022838 Proposed Conversational PS RABs for TR 25.993 [R'99] Hutchison 3G
This document was revised before presentation into R2-023116:

R2-023116 Additional new RABs TR 25.993 Hutchison 3G
This document was presented by Gordon Young from Hutchison 3G.
Discussion:
Decision: This will be included in the TR.

R2-023117 Proposed Conversational PS RABs for TR 25.993 [R'99] Hutchison 3G
This document was presented by Gordon Young from Hutchison 3G.
This is a resubmission from RAN2 Meeting#32.
Discussion:
Decision: This will be included in the TR.

R2-022912 Proposed bearer combinations [R'99] for PS streaming service (25.993) Nokia
This document was presented by Juha Mikola from Nokia.
Discussion:
A mapping table is required.
Decision: This will be sent to RAN1 (CC RAN), so that RAN WG1 can check the parameters. The updated proposal of changes is in R2-023148. The proposed LS is in R2-023149. See also R2-023033.

R2-023033 Introduction of streaming 16/128 kbps PS RAB + I/B 8/8 kbps T-Mobile, Siemens
This document was presented by Joerg Schniedenham from Siemens.
Discussion:
This has already been seen by RAN WG1.
One RAB is present in both documents (16/128). But the RLC PDU size is different.
Decision: This RAB will be removed from the Nokia proposal. This addition is agreed and will be merged with the Hutchison 3G proposal). Proposal of changes in R2-023150.

R2-023215 Updated version of 25.993 T-Mobile
This document was presented by Axel from T-Mobile.
Discussion:
This needs to be refined again to align the UE capability, but this is the latest available version of this TR.
The renumbering align this TR 25.993 with TS 34.108
Decision: The document was noted.

R2-023150 Addition of new RABs in TR 25.993 Hutchison 3G, Siemens and T-Mobile
This document was presented by Gordon Young from Hutchison 3G.
This is the result of the merge following earlier discussions during the week.
Discussion:
Decision: The proposal was agreed and will be presented at the plenary. The changes are in R2-023254.

6.18 Proposed changes on 34.109
There was no input for this agenda item.
6.19 TSG-T WG1-related activities
6.19.1 Misalignments between Test Specifications and Core Specifications
R2-022783 UL Reference Measurement Channels Nokia
This document was revised before presentation into R2-023029.

R2-023029 Revised document on UL Reference Measurement Channels Nokia
This document was presented by Luis Barreto from Nokia.
Discussion:
This document is linked with the LS received from T WG1 in R2-023032.
Decision: The minimum TFC point will be corrected. The 25.321 CRs are agreed into R2-023152, R2-023153 and R2-023154. CR numbers in 149, 150 and 151.
The 34.109 CRs are agreed in tdocs R2-023155, R2-023156 and R2-023157. CR numbers are 020, 021 and 022.

6.19.2 Proposed additions of test cases
There was no document under this agenda item.
6.19.3 Others
R2-022837 Removal of RABs from TS 34.108 Hutchison 3G
This document was presented by Gordon Young from Hutchison 3G.
Discussion:
This was discussed in RAN1 the week before.
Decision: The final decision will be left to the RAN and T plenaries. LS in R2-023151.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext