Sharks in the Septic Tank Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: one_less who wrote (67287)	11/21/2002 6:05:32 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (3) of 82486

Some people label it a "bully" problem, some consider it criminal harassment, some think it just extreme bad manners, some emotional abuse, etc etc. These variances are marginal and so don't effect the essential definition of it and its resolution. I think you are right that the most constructive way to define "it" is that Chris is guilty of "something." On that point I don't think you'll get any argument from anyone, except Chris, of course. But I think you underestimate the significance of the variances. Just the other day, while I was here doing yeoman's work trying to bring Chris across to the "something" POV, JLA was on House giving me the back of his hand for not "getting it." I don't think that, if Chris were to come around to the "something" school of thought, the problem would be resolved. It would only shift the fight to one between those who think the "something" was sufficient and those who are committed to the full party line.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next