SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jlallen who wrote (322272)11/21/2002 6:05:44 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (2) of 769670
 
Plaintiff must be a liberal. Everything is someone else's fault.

McDonald's seeks to get obesity lawsuit dismissed

NEW YORK (Reuters) — A lawyer for McDonald's argued Wednesday
that consumers know that hamburgers and French fries are fattening and urged a federal
judge to throw out a suit blaming the company for obesity and diabetes in children.

His arguments were made at the first federal court hearing in
the controversial case aimed at holding McDonald's
responsible for children's health and weight problems. Although
other suits have been filed over the issue, lawyers said this is
the only one that is actively being litigated.

U.S. District Judge Robert Sweet said he would decide later whether to dismiss the suit.

"The plaintiffs' lawsuit asks the court to abandon common knowledge, common sense," said Bradley
Lerman, a lawyer representing McDonald's.

He said that the law does not require that restaurants warn customers of the "universally understood" fact
that common foods contain fat, salt, sugar, cholesterol and other basic ingredients. Lerman said that
reasonable people know what products are in hamburgers and fries and what excessive eating of those
products does to one's body over a prolonged period.

"People don't wake up one day thin then wake up the next day and are obese," he said.

The suit, argued Lerman, does not allege that McDonald's products are defective or contaminated but
instead tries to hold the company responsible for telling people something that is commonly understood.
He said that McDonald's has never billed their Big Macs or fried foods as being as low in calories as a
"spinach salad."

"With most meals eaten at home, and about 900,000 dining options available to American consumers
every day, McDonald's is no more responsible for an individual's overall diet and lifestyle choices than any
other food destination, whether it's your own kitchen, local restaurant or grocery store," the company said
in a statement.

Samuel Hirsch, the lawyer who filed the suit, alleged that McDonald's has deliberately tried to mislead the
public into thinking Big Macs and other products are nutritious. He said that while the chain might post
nutritional information in its restaurants the information is often difficult to understand and placed in hard to
read locations.

"It's a serious lawsuit with serious issues," he said. "They have deliberately withheld information."

The suit is one of four cases filed against McDonald's and other fast food chains over the obesity issue.
However, two cases have been dismissed and another is dormant.

The current action, which seeks unspecified damages, was brought on behalf of overweight children who
consumed foods at two McDonald's located in the Bronx. One of the plaintiffs is a 14-year-old girl who is
4 foot 10 inches tall and weighs 170 pounds.

It seeks class action status to represent other children throughout New York State.

The plaintiffs allege that the McDonald's restaurants violated New York State's consumer fraud statutes
by failing to adequately disclose the ingredients in some of the foods and the possible health effects caused
by eating them.
usatoday.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext