You said...
You will always encounter an offensive reaction from a loyal American when there is an attack on the integrity of his commander in chief.
That's always except when it's a Democrat, then? Explain how this isn't partisan.
Integrity is realising when you're being led by a womanising braggart, OR a dim plutocratic puppet, and not being afraid to say so.
Are you afraid to say so? Intimidated Maybe gullible? (Actually, I think not, but I believe in offering you that choice)
Or just toeing the party line?
Clinton had an economic policy beyond tax cuts for the rich and pork for big pharma, cleared the budget deficit, understood that there's a whole planet being f*cked up for our children... those pluses outweigh his roving penis.
As a leader, he had integrity. If you can't get beyond the sex issue, that's your bad.
Bush is out to bribe and enrich his friends and hide his misdeeds and lack of nous. He may have integrity as a man, bar the earlier womanising, lying, draft-avoidance and drugs... but as a leader, none. BTW, it doesn't take bravery or integrity to have the biggest armed forces in history. But it surely helps conceal cowardice... |
