Does Cosmic think this is weird?
Now as to the rules on SI- I have an interest in the rules on SI- not about the aliases who violate the rules. It's a game and there are rules. The rules are there to be used. If you violate the TOU you deserve to get terminated, shut down, or suspended. It's just a part of the game.
Does cosmic think that you think the sexual-type slang words you try to get people kicked off for are
harassing, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, abusive, threatening, harmful, vulgar, obscene, tortuous, improper or otherwise objectionable
, but that the sexual insinuations and plaguing and revealing confidences about personal life and threatening to post PM's and emails and lies CH tormented Poet with for months on end until she called his bluff weren't?
Like, not even "otherwise objectionable"?
How about "threatening," since CH repeatedly threatened to reveal PM's and emails containing, he claimed, intimacies of a... shall we say... certain nature?
How about "vulgar"?Wasn't CH even "vulgar"? You and I have been that; not CH?
How about "invasive of another's privacy"? He not only "threatened" that, he did it, with references to her family!
How about "harmful," which was obvious to all even before she got sick from it? Wasn't CH "harmful," and therefore violating the TOU?
Or does the TOU get applied quite selectively by X of the "Rules" -- silence them if they use a bad word, but defend to the death their right to threaten, abuse and harm.
cosmic is right. It is weird, here. But the weirdest of all is you, X of the "Rules." |
