I knew that, you silly! I just wanted it to be perfectly clear to anyone who might have forgotten.
It would be the height of foolishness for me to do so, given what I've seen of you, and yours
That's quite insulting, but means nothing: If you agreed, and the entities you are insulting violated the deal, you'd be free to recommence needling, n'est-ce pas?
. I will never agree to any restriction on my speech, that is not in the TOU. Ever
Gosh, you remind me of Patrick Henry!
And you love freedom of speech soooo much that you won't even agree to restriction on CH's when it is against the TOU!
oh yes, i fergot, you simply deny that his treatment of Poet was
harassing,
invasive of privacy,
threatening,
otherwise improper,
or even
harmful!
and so... therefore... it is,
According To The Sacred Rules Of Xland,
NOT a violation of the TOU the way a vulgar word would be!
So he should be able to keep "getting off on it" (your expression) as long as he wants. In Xland.
And since to you it doesn't matter to you what "harmful" thing (including death, you've let us know, so no wonder Poet's illness didn't ruffle your feathers, i mean sheesh!) happens to "aliases," the harm and the threats the TOU prohibits doesn't...somehow... count. To you.
Ah, the majesty of the Sacred Rules...
but wait
selectively applied
it's kinda
unmajestic |
