SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Neocon who wrote (68656)11/27/2002 11:39:09 AM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) of 82486
 
"Now, I am not quite sure from your account how you mean to use self- evidence in relation to charity, and therefore I am not ratifying your account. "

knowing that I am at risk of being hit with X's dictionary of undiscussable terminology, I will bravely offer an explanation.

I understand that there is such a thing as giving for no other motivation that for the benefit of some other being. That to me constitutes a charitable act. I believe that idea is valid and I know what it represents. It is likely that I could not prove for others that there are actual charitable actions or events, since it would involve proving the motive of the giver.

I conclude that the existence of charity as an absolute is true, but as I said I can not offer proof using scientific method alone.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext