Oh, I see, your legal assessment skills are responsible for your (allegedly) profitable trades.
You've got me rolling on the floor again, Gussie. Stop, I can't take it.
Has it crossed your feeble mind that perhaps your litigation assessment skills (?) have had nothing to do with your (allegedly) profitable trades?
Has it crossed your mind that you might very well end up holding the proverbial bag due to your superior litigation risk assessment skills (?) when the jury delivers its verdict? Your pain will be as serious as it was for all the other poor IDCC longs who were so good at assessing litigation risks when Motorola put the whip to IDCC. Everybody said Motorola should have lost that case, too, Gussie, but it didn't, did it?
You essentially have yourself as a client, Gussie, and we know one of you is a damned fool.
You going to hold long through the trial? You going to be a long when the verdict is delivered? You going to be there after the interminable appeals and delays, hoping there hasn't been a screwup that'll rob IDCC of a victory or that some appellate judge who, like you, doesn't know shit from Shinola, but holds a grudge against one of the law firms, doesn't make you a new one?
Gussie, that's the heart of the problem with IDCC--it's a company manned by lawyers relying on a lawsuit for its big break. A real loser's business strategy.
Litigation is a minefield, don't step on anything strange, Gussie. |
