Interesting premise Thomas, as well as an expansion of your previous rhetoric claiming the US provided Saddam with CW technology (which I reject).
LOL! That does speak volumes about your credibility, since I already posted the evidence to you.
Message 18279474
But Thomas, let's just pretend to agree that Saddam received a "nod" from the Reagan administration back then (or feigned indifference).
No, let's not pretend. This is not the Republican Party Convention. This is the real world. Reagan armed and funded Saddam, both directly AND indirectly. Donald Rumsfeld was the broker, in fact.
zmag.org
Doesn't your logic give the US the IMPLICIT, if not COMPELLING right/responsibility to ensure that these weapons are accounted for and never abused again??
Obviously not. I'm not surprised you can't fathom the immoral nature of such a suggestion. I believe it was your fellow slug Brumar who had the same idea. Obviously, criminals don't earn law enforcement stripes because of their criminality. They lose those rights, and honest people are appointed to punish them and clean up the mess.
Tom |
