I'm not denying that I was talking about you. What I said was if I was to be sneaky like you I could make the same claim you did - I never said that - since I didn't actually use your name. But I'm not denying I was talking about you.
Now as to you where you insinuated - that's in the recent posts like those below. Your meaning is pretty clear - 6 million didn't die, there were no mass graves, the ovens couldn't have burned so many people. Sure you pose your insinuations as questions, as doubts - but that's just so you can deny what you're up to when you're called on it. A chicken shit tactic.
To:Robert Barry who wrote (18076)
From: len grasso
Tuesday, Dec 3, 2002 2:02 PM
View Replies (2) | Respond to of 18234
Where does the six million figure come from?
A number passed down and put forward from "scholar" to scholar and book to book?
and
To:epsteinbd who wrote (18134)
From: len grasso
Tuesday, Dec 3, 2002 2:59 PM
View Replies (1) | Respond to of 18235
Are you admitting there were no mass graves?
I question everything, especially when I know how "facts" are embellished and there is a strong incentive and reward to do so.
and
To:epsteinbd who wrote (18144)
From: len grasso
Tuesday, Dec 3, 2002 3:27 PM
View Replies (2) | Respond to of 18235
High tech?
Those dinky ovens are high tech?
The Nazis would yet be firing those biscuit burners today in order to kill six million cats.
Doubt is good when there are scoundrels about, even if the US Army is involved, especially if the US Army is involved. |
