SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: LindyBill who wrote (59943)12/5/2002 9:39:58 AM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
Hoagland on the Antiwar problem. This is what cost the Dems so much in the election, IMO.

You share that assessment with Bill Clinton, of course. I certainly wouldn't disagree that was one of the issues that hurt them. But a full analysis is more complicated. I'll skip that for the moment. But we should have a discussion about the election some time. Perhaps the two of us could simply declare that we are going offtopic together and anyone who wishes can read or skip our posts.

I continue to believe that Ken Pollack and his coauthor, name escapes me, in that Policy Review piece, laid out the foundations for a very large part of a very different foreign policy, one that is both better and more politically astute, which a Dem candidate like John Kerrey could well draw on. Because it fits precisely with other things he has already said.

If you have time, I suggest you read Joe Klein's piece on Kerrey in The New Yorker of a week ago. The piece is not online so it would require a trip to Border's. Moreover, the way Klein frames it, the critique is one roughly shared by Kerrey's buddies, McCain, Hagel, Cleland, Kerry, all the present and former Senate Vietnam Vets.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext