SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: i-node who wrote (155765)12/6/2002 11:22:59 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (2) of 1585525
 
As you've explained it, Mr. Bush in his masterful way was trying to scare Saddam into complying without having to go to war.

A lie. What I've consistently said is that we will FORCE Saddam to comply. It is obvious that in the past Saddam has not responded to threats of force. If he wants to avoid being ejected from Iraq, he should respond this time. If he doesn't respond, Bush will remove him.


No, the lie is your current spin. You said over and over and over that in effect you believed Mr. Bush was beating the war drums with the intent of threatening Saddam into compliance, and that you did not think actual force was really necessary.

See that's the problem with spin.....you never know when its going to trip you up.

You would not understand this.

No, I don't understand why people like you lie......

And S. Harris wonders why the world is becoming increasingly hostile towards us.

What the rest of the world thinks just really doesn't matter in the slightest to me. We now have a president who is looking out for OUR interests rather than those of China and everywhere else.


It doesn't serve OUR interests in the least to alienate the entire world against us. That's what Bush has done.......he is the worst president in two hundred years.

ted
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext