Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: epicure who wrote (61046)	12/11/2002 9:48:42 AM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (3) of 281500

There is a difference between setting up theme houses and letting students choose where to live (and ending up with de facto segregation), and telling students they must live in their enclaves (de jure segregation) Not much, X. And it is going against everything the Civil Rights movement fought for. The overt racism is this country is getting worse, and these programs encourage it at a very critical time in students lifes. When Colleges first integrated in the '60,s the schools made a point of mixing people without regard to race in the dorms. I keep reading that there is almost no mixing of races now on campus's, which was not true in the '70s. These theme houses are set by by University Administrations who are selling out to the racial radicals. They talk about making students proud of their race, instead of making them proud of their individual accomplishments. In addition to living segregated lives in their dorm, these students then spend a lot their University time in segregated classes, under the heading of Chicano, Black, or Women's Studies. It is not only illegal, it is a very bad trend in Education, IMO.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next