SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: FaultLine who wrote (61391)12/13/2002 10:27:10 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
Carl was right, my details were a faulty, but the substance was correct. It is provocative to say that Bush has " zero respect for international treaties", when that clearly does not apply to treaties that were actually ratified, but to some that were not. Later, despite noting the difference between signing and ratification, she did imply that signing was sufficient to bind the current administration. Nadine merely reacted to the idea of being bound, and used the word "signed" as one would referring to a contract. It was the wrong word, but the right concept, as it were. Carl complains about the "piling on", but the condemnation of the administration was worded in a way that was bound to offend some posters......
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News