SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tejek who wrote (156187)12/15/2002 2:23:52 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) of 1579130
 
My point is mitigated....huh? Your comment makes no sense. Are Reps. changing the meaning of words now?

It is you who cannot make sense.

You have repeatedly bashed Bush for not getting Bin Laden. Now, you ask, "At the time, the Sudanese were ready to give up bin Laden what crime had he been found guilty of?".

I simply said that Bin Laden has NEVER been found guilty of ANY crime that I'm aware of. If a predetermination of guilt is your criterion, then neither Bush NOR Clinton should have captured Bin Laden.

Of course, your argument makes zero sense. Clinton certainly should have had Bin Laden's head; and Bush isn't finished yet.

Bush's capture of Bin Laden on 9/12 would not have made any difference about 9/11. Clinton's capture of Bin Laden in the late 90s would possibly have eliminated 9/11.

You really have no leg to stand on in this argument .. when you're in a hole, stop digging....
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News