EDTA (was GIFT) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : EDTA (was GIFT)

EDTA 0.000200

+300.1%

Mar 7 3:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Doug Lakin who wrote (558)	7/20/1996 11:06:00 AM
From: Mel Spivak	of 2383

Doug you got it McGraw-Hill and the other big money infringers of the patent are grinding their ax. Its not whether the patent's claims are valid or not. To the big money defendants, its search and destroy. Like Watergate, Pentagon Papers, the philosophy is swithch the focus from the truth to sifting thru irrelevant (to the truth of the validity of the claims) dirt to try to discredit GIFT and all shareholders (us) from what we are truly entitled. To the extent that THEY have accomplished their goals by causing losses, by the "reckless discregard of the truth" THEY (whoever they may be) have set themselves up for a Defamation law suit that carries with it damages + punative damages. If it appears to be the case, in light of NY Times vs Sullivan, et al and its progany of 1st Amendment cases, which shows reasonable probability of success of such a lawsuit and sufficient resulting award of damages, this should be considered. Retaining attorneys on a "contingency fee basis" may be the way to go. These are my initial impressions. Mel

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next