"But I think you should feel uncomfortable arguing to impose your religiously based, personal, moral judgment on others."
I have noticed that Neocon's moral judgement is based primarily on a philosophy of life. One that is founded in principle acquired by a study of justice, morality, personal introspection, religious text, education, culture, and history. It appears that he has sought and found confirmation for his points of views from various sources that he considers credible. I have probably left out a few major influences but the point is, that it is not a religious base apart from the overall personality that forms his perspective.
Further, as far as I can see, he has no authority, right, or might to enforce his moral judgements onto others.
Why do you feel you have the right to discount perspectives on morality simply because they could be reflected by religious doctrine? |
