Luc:
I love the definitive nature of your assertions. Luc says it is so therefore it is true.
And let's get another thing clear,.... your put-down "add-ons",.... i.e., "sucking on a pipe", which you resort to so frequently, do little to strengthen the validity of your assertions, but merely underline the lack of intelligent back-up logic or counter point at your disposal. Suggestion,.... cut the smart-apple remarks and get down to writing well-thought-out responses that underline why you think as you do, rather than the smug "one-liner" put-downs.
By the way, you also might wish to have a look at the comments of some other "know-nothings" such as Richard Russell, especially the last sentence. From his remarks of last night,......
" Flash -- Blanchard & Co. announced a law suit today against ABX claiming
that ABX is in restraint of trade under the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, and that
ABX with its massive shorting operations over the years has hurt Blanchard's
clients. I read the report, and it's very interesting to say the least. It
will also involve J.P. Morgan. It's possible that this law suit could crack
the whole disgusting gold manipulation game wide open. "
As you are no doubt aware, I love the "give and take" of good debate. If you want to engage in that, then have at it. But retain a degree of civility and marshall intelligent arguments rather than resort to the jerky, put-down comments.
Earlie |
