EDTA (was GIFT) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : EDTA (was GIFT)

EDTA 0.000200

+300.1%

Mar 7 3:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Mel Spivak who wrote (559)	7/20/1996 1:51:00 PM
From: Harlan Bachmayer	of 2383

It seems to me that a defendent in a case that publishes information that gives an opinion that the patent will likely be overturned could be considered tampering with the case that is in progress. I hope the judge is made very aware of these tactics and will act accordingly to stop further tampering. Just a thought, how legal would it be for someone that might know an agreement is close and deliberately trashes a stock to drive the price down before the annoucement of said agreement, to obtain shares at a cheap price before it skyrockets? I don't know but if a news article causes shareholders to sell and then it turns out to be just the opposite is true, its seems a class action lawsuit could be very probable. As for the case being made of prior art, I don't see that the example of Telephone Software Company having any means to pay electronically for said transactions. Which I believe is provided for in the Freeny patent. Mr. Freeny certainly had a much better vision of the future and was awarded his patent to which, I haven't seen a case of prior art that can be applied. I'll wait until this bottoms and any sign of an upward trend, I'll buy with both hands. Harlan

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next