Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: tejek who wrote (156543)	12/19/2002 9:51:04 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) of 1583102

That's not what the letter said and on this particular issue, its important to mince words. Why do you people continue to argue with the facts? The letters words were to the effect of, "should you use WMD against us the president reserves the right to retaliate with ANYTHING in the United States' arsenal". In the last month Schwartzkopf has stated on "Hardball" that Saddam clearly got the message and there was no question what it meant. Secondly, it was a ploy that may or may not of worked Well, it may or may not have. Two things are known: (1) (I'll repeat, since you guys seem not to get it) The American leadership of the day believes it was crucial, and (2) We don't know what worked, but SOMETHING did, because he did not use WMD against us. So what's the big deal? It is no big deal except that some liberals on this thread have suggested that Bush should take our nuclear weapons off the table, which would be 110% stupid. That's what the big deal is.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next