Twin Mining (formerly Twin-Gold) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Twin Mining (formerly Twin-Gold)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Letmebe Frank who wrote (567)	12/20/2002 12:41:52 PM
From: Valuepro	Read Replies (1) of 613

Hi, Frank I agree. I had SWG on my watch list, but missed it. Also watching GAM and NSU. MAN may have problems, but their price was very tempting a few weeks ago. Anyway, I would like to see TWG sell the Atlanta project to reduce the need to raise cash for the diamond work. Maybe they are thinking along the same lines, too, but need to do some additional work to raise the value. I know others do not see it this way, however, as Atlanta provides a bit of a fall back option in case the diamond prospects are a complete bust. Similar situation with SUF, I think. Value might be better served by making two divisions out of the company - one mining/exploring platinum, and the other diamonds.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next