Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (62774)	12/22/2002 3:53:42 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (2) of 281500

The overarching claim, that Iraq possesses weapons of mass destruction, may have the weight of probability behind it, but it has yet to be backed by proof shared with the public. Karen... Saddam said the same thing back in 1994-95.. That he didn't have anymore WMDs... But upon the defection of several key individuals involved in developing and storing these weapons, it was proven that he was LYING... And when the UNSCOM inspectors left in 1998, by THEIR OWN REPORT, thousands of tonnes of chemicals and biological agents were yet to be properly accounted for... Saddam should have been overthrown back then, as a repercussion for his having deliberately lied to the UN and the world. But he wasn't.. So are you going to believe him now?? If so... One has to wonder what color the sky is in your world... No offense.. But trying to claim that the US is just making up these charges denies the history of Saddam's duplicity surrounding the issue of WMDs.. There will be proof when we can have REAL INSPECTIONS, and be able to interview Iraqi weapons producers outside of Iraq where they and their families cannot be intimidated by Saddam's regime. Hawk

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next