|
qdog, stop being cute. The record shows: Razor talked to Huddleston.Razor posted to us that Huddleston told him, in effect, that AIPN management had distorted Huddleston's report to the Co for the purpose of "hyping" the stock. Betty called Huddleston, and pledged to Huddleston, as a condition of his talking to her, not to reveal the contents of their conversation without his express permission, which he did not give. Betty kept her word. I do not doubt that such confidentiality was at least implicitly a condition of Huddleston's talking to Razor. When Betty refused to break her word to Huddleston, I jumped in and posted what I surmised Huddleston had really said to both Razor and Betty, AND flatly accused Razor of lying to us by deliberately distorting and otherwise falsifying what Huddleston had really said to him. I here and now repeat that accusation. Betty then posted, saying that my said accusatory post was "reasonable", all she could say and still keep her word to Huddleston. Taylor went along with Razor's deception, using it to trash the stock. Obviously, Huddleston demanded the confidentiality because he did not want to get down in the gutter with the likes of Razor and Taylor, a wise decision on his part. Now you join the chorus of naysayers who approve of this reprehensible crap. As the old song says: "You can tell a man who boozes by the company he chooses. And the pig got up and slowly walked away."Geneat |
