SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Rascal who wrote (63258)12/28/2002 11:38:37 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
Furthermore, please remind me again why we are going to invade Iraq which may have the bomb soon but "encourage the resumption of engagement" with North Korea which has a bomb and is yelling "Up yours".

So Saddam Hussein does not get the chance to play the same game. One nuclear-armed fruitcake at a time is quite enough, don't you think?

Consistency in Foreign Policy is desirable.

Okay, either Bush is making a BIG mistake by not adopting South Korea's "sunshine" policy, or else he showing that horrible thing, "inconsistency", by only pressuring North Korea and not invading this minute. Make up your mind, would you?

The situations are different -- just to set out the most obvious difference, we do not have a good military option in the case of North Korea. If we even bomb their nuclear plant, they are liable to level Seoul. We do have a good military option in Iraq, but we won't anymore if they get nukes. Is that plain enough for you?

Sheesh. There are adult arguments that can be made against Bush's foreign policy. But "you're being inconsistent!" and "it's all about oooooiiiiiil!" are not among them.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext