SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JohnM who wrote (63538)12/30/2002 9:35:39 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (2) of 281500
 
There are several theories


The article lists two. But they do not list the most obvious. That the Thugs already have a working bomb, and to attack them would set off an Atomic Attack on South Korea. That is why I believe they are doing what Cha described in the NYT yesterday. Simply letting them fall and waiting to talk to the new group of thugs that take over when the Army Revolts for lack of Food and heat.

Now I wonder why Raines left that theory out? Hmmmm. Could it be because it does not make the Administration look bad? (And don't think for a minute that his fingerprints were not all over this copy.)

You won't accept the House Report on Korea because it is a Political Doc. Too bad we are going to start having to do the same with the NYT.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News