SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Policy Discussion Thread

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elmer Flugum who wrote (1280)12/30/2002 4:00:04 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) of 15987
 
Well, on the War thread you've claimed to believe the Nazis didn't kill many Jews, certainly not 6 million, didn't bury victims in mass graves, didn't burn corpses from the death camps. Despite the presence of much testimony to the contrary of your beliefs. Would anti-semitism have anything to do with this? Most of the folks who consider themselves
"holocaust revisionists" are anti-semites IMO. But I'm guessing you wouldn't think so.

To:Robert Barry who wrote (18076)
From: len grasso
Tuesday, Dec 3, 2002  2:02 PM
View Replies (2) | Respond to of 18234
Where does the six million figure come from?
A number passed down and put forward from "scholar" to scholar and book to book?
and
To:epsteinbd who wrote (18134)
From: len grasso
Tuesday, Dec 3, 2002  2:59 PM
View Replies (1) | Respond to of 18235
Are you admitting there were no mass graves?
I question everything, especially when I know how "facts" are embellished and there is a strong incentive and reward to do so.
and
To:epsteinbd who wrote (18144)
From: len grasso
Tuesday, Dec 3, 2002  3:27 PM
View Replies (2) | Respond to of 18235
High tech?
Those dinky ovens are high tech?
The Nazis would yet be firing those biscuit burners today in order to kill six million cats.
Doubt is good when there are scoundrels about, even if the US Army is involved, especially if the US Army is involved.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext