SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: AllansAlias who wrote (62384)12/30/2002 11:08:53 PM
From: Shack  Read Replies (2) of 209892
 
I agree that that thing does not count great as an Elliott wedge, that middle wave is too straight. I pulled the trigger because I thought we were going to close strong and give us a hammer of sorts. I have seen too many of these wedges break before the putative 'e' wave gets near the wedge line and I am left with no position. This often happens to me on a gap up (or down) so I took a stab near the close. But the weak close (and the INTC drain) was my signal to get out and I actually have an overnight NQ short position.

I am still looking down but I am looking for spots to hedge, not for a major position. Today I thought we had one but I changed my tune as I mentioned. However I would note that the SOX 270-280 area has been an inflection point going back to 1997. I likely will look long again around there.

Elliott-wise, I agree about the possibility of the second leg down off the flat but the paltry volume has really bugged me, it really does not support it. It tells me that we may very well be in some running Jell-O rather than an impulse. As a result I am only looking for 3 waves down off that flat for now, and we are very close to where the third wave should stop (my target is around 273) for what I think will be a Jell-O bounce.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext