SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Moominoid who wrote (212078)1/1/2003 1:47:40 PM
From: Tommaso  Read Replies (3) of 436258
 
From what I read (most recently, in Scientific American)incremental improvements in batteries have been quite disappointing. Seems to me that ethanol or methanol powered internal combustion engines are nearly as clean as hydrogen, though they do add carbon dioxide. The whole issue of what CO2 is doing to make the planet less habitable for human beings is very far from settled. Some things I have read suggest that plant life on earth suffers from an insatiable craving for more CO2; I have heard of studies that show that co2-enriched atmospheres in greenhouses cause plants to grow faster. The charm of hydrogen is, of course, that it just turns to water. But my own empirical experience with hydrogen has been that it is much harder to handle and more dangerous than other fuels. I have met people who feel the same way about methane, so maybe I am just prejudiced the way they are. I have experienced hydrogen explosions, and you notice no one makes airships using it, though it is about one-eighth the weight of helium (I think).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext