SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: hmaly who wrote (157271)1/2/2003 12:04:39 PM
From: Alighieri  Read Replies (1) of 1580053
 
Bingo. Saddam is by far the safest bet. Isn't that what I said all along. Saddam's weapons of mass destruction aren't the real reason GW wants to take
out Saddam. Iraq is the perfect place to start the war.

I myself cannot be as cynical as you, or Bush or the writer of this story, when it comes to war that will cost lives of Iraqi civilians and Americans. This is not some board game we are talking about. People will die brutally.

Why
then, as none other than Saddam Hussein has noted, is the United States on Iraq's case and threatening and preparing for military action
against it while it wants to resolve the nuclear row with self-admitted nuke constructor North Korea by diplomatic means?

But you see, I believe that both conflicts can be resolved peacefully. So I agree with the adminstration's efforts to resolve this without war. My complaint is that the adminstration has created an unnecessary crisis that now has to be solved diplomatically anyway.

Al
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News