SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Applied Materials No-Politics Thread (AMAT)
AMAT 235.24+4.5%Nov 19 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Gottfried who wrote (4720)1/3/2003 11:23:44 PM
From: Sarmad Y. Hermiz  Read Replies (3) of 25522
 
>> Either chip makers have enough capacity or they have cold feet.

Gottfried,

Regarding the 2nd chart showing semiconductor shipments.
home.attbi.com

It shows shipments of $3B/month in late 2000. That was 2 years ago. Obviously there was fabrication capacity to produce all those chips. Now semi shipments are at half that level - under $1.5B/month.

I wonder how that works in terms of units. Obviously capacity is for units - not dollars.

Assuming that the useful life of fabrication equip is several years. It seems there is enough equip in place to take care of all the old applications. So I assume only new designs need new fab equip. And how long does it take for "new" chips to become the majority of chips ?

Prior to mid-1999 there were no Intel Pentium processors at the 1 GH speed. Since mid-2002, you cannot find any Pentium chips slower than 1 GH. I assume that increasing the speed required new fab equip. So possibly 3 years is the life-time of a chip design.

I think the same logic and timing applies to how digital cell phone service displaced analog. And maybe also to how LCD panels are displacing computer monitors. And DVR'd are displacing VCR's. And DVD's are displacing tape.

So my spotty argument tells me that even though there is 50% unused capacity, it will all be obsolete by the end of 2003. Which may still be considered a U in Jacob's reckoning, rather than a V. However, very likely most investors will want to be long rather than short well before the end of the year.

Sarmad
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext