My point is you either make a reasonable argument that holds water to try to persuade people to your point of view, or you make up stuff that is sensational and causes people to disregard you as serious.
You claim that you put posters like PROLIFE, jallen and rollcast on ignore. When you use terms like boy king and mental midgetry, You are not much different than they are. You are not advancing anything, you are polarizing things. Why not stick to the facts? It's not like Bush doesn't do a semi-permanent levitating act due to sticking one or both feet in his mouth, no? Is this administration really so hard to criticize on the basis of the facts, or must underhanded outright distortion be used? Didn't we get a belly full of that against the last administration? Was there any difference between the way Nixon and Clinton were impeached? You think that Woodward or Drudge should be a role model in your attack? You can only pick one, and Drudge is the way you are going.....
I liked 'king george' though, that can be construed as a sly allusion to his misunderstanding of the powers of the presidency. that Kind of intelligent humor can work. This is "DON"T START THE WAR", not a Bush bash or mudslinging party. Who wants to wade through tens of posts with no message other than 'Bush sucks' or 'You are a moron', 'You triple suck into infinity cubed'?
So, Ray, last time. Do you believe that the US will first strike ANYWHERE with a nuke? Are you an America hater or just critical of some policies? |
